Page 14 - SPEMD_61-3

104 rev port estomatol med dent cir maxilofac. 2020;61(3):97-105

For this study, FDI criteria were used as opposed to the 5. Cruz J, Sousa B, Coito C, Lopes M, Vargas M, Cavalheiro A.
United States Public Health Service (USPHS) modified criteria Microtensile bond strength to dentin and enamel of self -etch
because authors of recent publications comparing the 6 -month vs. etch -and -rinse modes of universal adhesives. Am J Dent.
2019;32:174 -82.
clinical performance of adhesion strategies using FDI and 6. Marchesi G, Frassetto A, Mazzoni A, Apolonio F, Diolosa M,
USPHS -modified criteria concluded that the FDI criteria are Cadenaro M, et al. Adhesive performance of a multi -mode
more sensitive than the USPHS -modified criteria to small vari- adhesive system: 1 -year in vitro study. J Dent. 2014;42:603 -12.
ations in clinical outcomes. 1,8,9,64 7. Perdigao J, Sezinando A, Monteiro PC. Laboratory bonding
Although significant differences were found in this study ability of a multi -purpose dentin adhesive. Am J Dent.
with the 6 -month evaluation, it may be interesting to consid- 2012;25:153 -8.
er a longer follow -up in future investigations. It would also be 8. Loguercio AD, de Paula EA, Hass V, Luque -Martinez I, Reis A,
important to evaluate this adhesive system’s behavior with Perdigao J. A new universal simplified adhesive: 36 -Month
randomized double -blind clinical trial. J Dent. 2015;43:1083 -92.
the selective -etch technique, comparing it with the SE and ER 9. Mena -Serrano A, Kose C, De Paula EA, Tay LY, Reis A, Loguercio
techniques, to better evaluate its clinical performance. AD, et al. A new universal simplified adhesive: 6 -month
clinical evaluation. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2013;25:55 -69.
10. Peumans M, De Munck J, Mine A, Van Meerbeek B. Clinical
Conclusions effectiveness of contemporary adhesives for the restoration
of non -carious cervical lesions. A systematic review. Dent
Mater. 2014;30:1089 -103.
The SE technique performed better than the ER technique for 11. Faye B, Sarr M, Bane K, Aidara AW, Niang SO, Kane AW.
the tested universal adhesive; thus, the null hypothesis is re- One -year clinical evaluation of the bonding effectiveness of a
jected. The 6 -month clinical performance of Adhese Univer- one -step, self -etch adhesive in noncarious cervical lesion
sal depends on the bonding strategy used. therapy. Int J Dent. 2015;2015:984065.
12. Perdigao J, Kose C, Mena -Serrano AP, De Paula EA, Tay LY, Reis
A, et al. A new universal simplified adhesive: 18 -month
Ethical disclosures clinical evaluation. Oper Dent. 2014;39:113 -27.
13. Oz FD, Ergin E, Canatan S. Twenty -four -month clinical
performance of different universal adhesives in etch -and-
Protection of human and animal subjects. The authors -rinse, selective etching and self -etch application modes in
declare that the procedures followed were in accordance with NCCL – a randomized controlled clinical trial. J Appl Oral Sci.
the regulations of the relevant clinical research ethics com- 2019;27:e20180358.
mittee and with those of the Code of Ethics of the World Med- 14. Schulz KF, Altman DG, Moher D, CONSORT Group. CONSORT
ical Association (Declaration of Helsinki). 2010 statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel
group randomised trials. Int J Surg. 2011;9:672 -7.
Confidentiality of data. The authors declare that they have 15. Loguercio AD, Reis A, Barbosa AN, Roulet JF. Five -year
followed their work center protocols on access to patient data double -blind randomized clinical evaluation of a resin-
and for its publication. -modified glass ionomer and a polyacid -modified resin in
noncarious cervical lesions. J Adhes Dent. 2003;5:323 -32.
Right to privacy and informed consent. The authors have 16. American Dental Association Council on Scientific Affairs.
obtained the written informed consent of the patients or sub- Chicago I (2001) Acceptance program guidelines: dentin and
jects mentioned in the article. The corresponding author is in enamel adhesive materials. American Dental Association.
possession of this document. 17. Cvar JF, Ryge G. Reprint of criteria for the clinical evaluation
of dental restorative materials. 1971. Clin Oral Investig.
2005;9:215 -32.
18. Hickel R, Peschke A, Tyas M, Mjor I, Bayne S, Peters M, et al.
Conflict of interest FDI World Dental Federation – clinical criteria for the
evaluation of direct and indirect restorations. Update and
The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare. clinical examples. J Adhes Dent. 2010;12:259 -72.
19. Hickel R, Roulet JF, Bayne S, Heintze SD, Mjor IA, Peters M, et
al. Recommendations for conducting controlled clinical
references studies of dental restorative materials. Science Committee
Project 2/98–FDI World Dental Federation study design (Part I)
1. Lopes LS, Calazans FS, Hidalgo R, Buitrago LL, Gutierrez F, and criteria for evaluation (Part II) of direct and indirect
Reis A, et al. Six -month Follow -up of Cervical Composite restorations including onlays and partial crowns. J Adhes
Restorations Placed With a New Universal Adhesive System: Dent. 2007;9(Suppl 1):121 -47.
A Randomized Clinical Trial. Oper Dent. 2016;41:465 -80. 20. Faul F, Erdfelder E, Buchner A, Lang AG. Statistical power
2. Carrilho E, Cardoso M, Marques Ferreira M, Marto CM, Paula analyses using G*Power 3.1: tests for correlation and
A, Coelho AS. 10 -MDP Based Dental Adhesives: Adhesive regression analyses. Behav Res Methods. 2009;41:1149 -60.
Interface Characterization and Adhesive Stability -A 21. Faul F, Erdfelder E, Lang AG, Buchner A. G*Power 3: a flexible
Systematic Review. Materials (Basel). 2019;12:790. statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral,
3. Munoz MA, Luque I, Hass V, Reis A, Loguercio AD, Bombarda and biomedical sciences. Behav Res Methods. 2007;39:175 -91.
NH. Immediate bonding properties of universal adhesives to 22. Hafer M, Jentsch H, Haak R, Schneider H. A three -year clinical
dentine. J Dent. 2013;41:404 -11. evaluation of a one -step self -etch and a two -step etch -and -rinse
4. Loguercio AD, Munoz MA, Luque -Martinez I, Hass V, Reis A, adhesive in non -carious cervical lesions. J Dent. 2015;43:350 -61.
Perdigao J. Does active application of universal adhesives to 23. Wagner A, Wendler M, Petschelt A, Belli R, Lohbauer U.
enamel in self -etch mode improve their performance? J Dent. Bonding performance of universal adhesives in different
2015;43:1060 -70. etching modes. J Dent. 2014;42:800 -7.