Page 15 - SPEMD_61-3

rev port estomatol med dent cir maxilofac . 2020;61(3):97-105 105

24. Rosa WL, Piva E, Silva AF. Bond strength of universal adhesives: 45. Van Meerbeek B, Yoshihara K, Yoshida Y, Mine A, De Munck J,
A systematic review and meta -analysis. J Dent. 2015;43:765 -76. Van Landuyt KL. State of the art of self -etch adhesives. Dent
25. McLean DE, Meyers EJ, Guillory VL, Vandewalle KS. Enamel Mater. 2011;27:17 -28.
Bond Strength of New Universal Adhesive Bonding Agents. 46. Yoshida Y, Van Meerbeek B, Nakayama Y, Yoshioka M,
Oper Dent. 2015;40:410 -7. Snauwaert J, Abe Y, et al. Adhesion to and decalcification of
26. Taschner M, Nato F, Mazzoni A, Frankenberger R, Kramer N, hydroxyapatite by carboxylic acids. J Dent Res. 2001;80:1565-
Di Lenarda R, et al. Role of preliminary etching for one -step -9.
self -etch adhesives. Eur J Oral Sci. 2010;118:517 -24. 47. Hashimoto M, Ohno H, Yoshida E, Hori M, Sano H, Kaga M, et
27. Van Landuyt KL, Peumans M, De Munck J, Lambrechts P, Van al. Resin -enamel bonds made with self -etching primers on
Meerbeek B. Extension of a one -step self -etch adhesive into a ground enamel. Eur J Oral Sci. 2003;111:447 -53.
multi -step adhesive. Dent Mater. 2006;22:533 -44. 48. Perdigao J, Carmo AR, Anauate -Netto C, Amore R, Lewgoy HR,
28. Torii Y, Itou K, Nishitani Y, Ishikawa K, Suzuki K. Effect of Cordeiro HJ, et al. Clinical performance of a self -etching
phosphoric acid etching prior to self -etching primer adhesive at 18 months. Am J Dent. 2005;18:135 -40.
application on adhesion of resin composite to enamel and 49. Pashley DH, Tay FR. Aggressiveness of contemporary
dentin. Am J Dent. 2002;15:305 -8. self -etching adhesives. Part II: etching effects on unground
29. Li N, Nikaido T, Alireza S, Takagaki T, Chen JH, Tagami J. enamel. Dent Mater. 2001;17:430 -44.
Phosphoric acid -etching promotes bond strength and formation 50. Perdigao J, Frankenberger R. Effect of solvent and rewetting
of acid -base resistant zone on enamel. Oper Dent. 2013;38:82 -90. time on dentin adhesion. Quintessence Int. 2001;32:385 -90.
30. Van Meerbeek B, De Munck J, Yoshida Y, Inoue S, Vargas M, 51. Tay FR, Pashley DH, Suh B, Carvalho R, Miller M. Single -step,
Vijay P, et al. Buonocore memorial lecture. Adhesion to self -etch adhesives behave as permeable membranes after
enamel and dentin: current status and future challenges. polymerization. Part I. Bond strength and morphologic
Oper Dent. 2003;28:215 -35. evidence. Am J Dent. 2004;17:271 -8.
31. Peumans M, Munck J, Van Landuyt K, Lambrechts P, Van 52. Tay FR, Pashley DH, Suh BI, Carvalho RM, Itthagarun A.
Meerbeek B. Three -year clinical effectiveness of a two -step Single -step adhesives are permeable membranes. J Dent.
self -etch adhesive in cervical lesions. Eur J Oral Sci. 2002;30:371 -82.
2005;113:512 -8. 53. Mirmohammadi H, Khosravi K, Kashani K, Kleverlaan C,
32. Van Meerbeek B, Perdigao J, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G. The Feilzer A. Influence of filler existence on microleakage of a
clinical performance of adhesives. J Dent. 1998;26:1 -20. self -etch adhesive system. J Conserv Dent. 2014;17:175 -8.
33. Tuncer D, Yazici AR, Ozgunaltay G, Dayangac B. Clinical 54. Miguez PA, Castro PS, Nunes MF, Walter R, Pereira PN. Effect
evaluation of different adhesives used in the restoration of of acid -etching on the enamel bond of two self -etching
non -carious cervical lesions: 24 -month results. Aust Dent J. systems. J Adhes Dent. 2003;5:107 -12.
2013;58:94 -100. 55. Peumans M, De Munck J, Van Landuyt KL, Poitevin A,
34. Santiago SL, Passos VF, Vieira AH, Navarro MF, Lauris JR, Lambrechts P, Van Meerbeek B. Eight -year clinical evaluation
Franco EB. Two -year clinical evaluation of resinous of a 2 -step self -etch adhesive with and without selective
restorative systems in non -carious cervical lesions. Braz enamel etching. Dent Mater. 2010;26:1176 -84.
Dent J. 2010;21:229 -34. 56. Peumans M, De Munck J, Van Landuyt K, Lambrechts P, Van
35. Powell LV, Johnson GH, Gordon GE. Factors associated with Meerbeek B. Five -year clinical effectiveness of a two -step
clinical success of cervical abrasion/erosion restorations. self -etching adhesive. J Adhes Dent. 2007;9:7 -10.
Oper Dent. 1995;20:7 -13. 57. Yaman BC, Dogruer I, Gumustas B, Efes BG. Three -year
36. Yoshiyama M, Carvalho RM, Sano H, Horner JA, Brewer PD, randomized clinical evaluation of a low -shrinkage silorane-
Pashley DH. Regional bond strengths of resins to human root -based resin composite in non -carious cervical lesions. Clin
dentine. J Dent. 1996;24:435 -42. Oral Investig. 2014;18:1071 -9.
37. Van Meerbeek B, Braem M, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G. 58. Gladys S, Van Meerbeek B, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G. Marginal
Morphological characterization of the interface between adaptation and retention of a glass -ionomer, resin -modified
resin and sclerotic dentine. J Dent. 1994;22:141 -6. glass -ionomers and a polyacid -modified resin composite in
38. Mjor I (1987) Reaction patterns of dentin. In: Thylstrup A. LS, cervical Class -V lesions. Dent Mater. 1998;14:294 -306.
and Qvist V (ed) Dentine and Dentine Reactions in the Oral Cavity. 59. Rosales -Leal JI, de la Torre -Moreno FJ, Bravo M. Effect of pulp
Oxford University Press 27 -31. pressure on the micropermeability and sealing ability of
39. Stanley HR, Pereira JC, Spiegel E, Broom C, Schultz M. The etch & rinse and self -etching adhesives. Oper Dent.
detection and prevalence of reactive and physiologic 2007;32:242 -50.
sclerotic dentin, reparative dentin and dead tracts beneath 60. Oliveira SS, Marshall SJ, Hilton JF, Marshall GW. Etching
various types of dental lesions according to tooth surface kinetics of a self -etching primer. Biomaterials.
and age. J Oral Pathol. 1983;12:257 -89. 2002;23:4105 -12.
40. Heymann HO, Sturdevant JR, Bayne S, Wilder AD, Sluder TB, 61. Goldberg M, Farges JC, Lacerda -Pinheiro S, Six N, Jegat N,
Brunson WD. Examining tooth flexure effects on cervical Decup F, et al. Inflammatory and immunological aspects of
restorations: a two -year clinical study. J Am Dent Assoc. dental pulp repair. Pharmacol Res. 2008;58:137 -47.
1991;122:41 -7. 62. Can Say E, Ozel E, Yurdaguven H, Soyman M. Three -year
41. Bayne SC, Heymann HO, Sturdevant JR, Wilder AD, Sluder TB. clinical evaluation of a two -step self -etch adhesive with or
Contributing co -variables in clinical trials. Am J Dent. without selective enamel etching in non -carious cervical
1991;4:247 -50. sclerotic lesions. Clin Oral Investig. 2014;18:1427 -33.
42. van Dijken JW. Clinical evaluation of three adhesive systems 63. Tuncer D, Celik C, Yamanel K, Arhun N. 1 year clinical
in class V non -carious lesions. Dent Mater. 2000;16:285 -91. evaluation of microhybrid composites used in the restoration
43. Blunck U, Knitter K, Jahn KR. Six -month clinical evaluation of of non -carious cervical lesions. Oral Health Dent Manag.
XP BOND in noncarious cervical lesions. J Adhes Dent. 2014;13:366 -71.
2007;9(Suppl 2):265 -8. 64. Perdigao J, Dutra -Correa M, Saraceni CH, Ciaramicoli MT,
44. Yoshida Y, Yoshihara K, Nagaoka N, Hayakawa S, Torii Y, Kiyan VH, Queiroz CS. Randomized clinical trial of four
Ogawa T, et al. Self -assembled Nano -layering at the Adhesive adhesion strategies: 18 -month results. Oper Dent.
interface. J Dent Res. 2012;91:376 -81. 2012;37:3 -11.