Page 41 - SPEMD_59-2

rev port estomatol med dent cir maxilofac . 2018;59(2):94-99 99

17. Haug RH, Assael LA. Outcomes of open versus closed 22. Asprino L, Consani S, de Moraes M. A comparative
treatment of mandibular subcondylar fractures. J Oral biomechanical evaluation of mandibular condyle fracture
Maxillofac Surg. 2000;159:370 -5. plating techniques. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2006; 64:452 -6.
18. Meyer C, Kahn JL, Lambert A, Boutemi P, Wilk A. Development 23. Vesnaver A. Open Reduction and internal fixation of
of a static simulator of the mandible. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. intra -articular fractures of the mandibular condyle: Our first
2000; 28:278-86. experiences. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2008;66:2123 -9.
19. Meyer C, Martin E, Kahn JL, Zink S. Development and 24. Choi K, Yang J, Chung H, Cho B. Current concepts in the
biomechanical testing of a new osteosynthesis plate (TCP) mandibular condyle fracture management part I: overview of
designed to stabilize mandibular condyle fractures. J condylar fracture. Arch Plast Surg. 2012; 39:291-300.
Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2007;35:84 -90. 25. Choi K, Yang J, Chung H, Cho B. Current concepts in the
20. Valiati R, Ibrahim D, Abreu MER, Heitz C, de Oliveira RB, mandibular condyle fracture management part II: overview
Pagnoncelli RM, et al. The treatment of condylar fractures: to of condylar fracture. Arch Plast Surg. 2012; 39:301-8.
open or not to open? A critical review of this controversy. Int 26. de Jesus GP, Vaz LG, Gabrielli MFR, Passeri LA, Oliveira TV,
J Med Sci. 2008;5:313 -8. Noritomi PY, et al. Finite element evaluation of three
21. Costa FWG, Bezerra MF, Ribeiro TR, Pouchain EC, Sabóia VPA, methods of stable fixation of condyle base fractures. Int J
Soares ECS. Biomechanical analysis of titanium plate Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2014;43:1251-6.
systems in mandibular condyle fractures. A systematized
literature review. Acta Cir Bras. 2012;27:424 -9.