Page 40 - SPEMD_60-4
P. 40

188                    rev port estomatol med dent cir maxilofac. 2019;60(4):175-188


           46. Kern JS, Kern T, Wolfart S, Heussen N. A systematic review   non-submerged ITI implants. Clin Oral Implants Res.
             and meta-analysis of removable and fixed implant-   2004;15:351-9.
             supported prostheses in edentulous jaws: post-loading   61. Francetti L, Romeo D, Corbella S, Taschieri S, Del Fabbro M.
             implant loss. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2016;27:174-95.   Bone level changes around axial and tilted implants in
           47. Muller F, Duvernay E, Loup A, Vazquez L, Herrmann FR,   full-arch fixed immediate restorations. Interim results of a
             Schimmel M. Implant-supported mandibular overdentures in   prospective study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2012;14:646-54.
             very old adults: a randomized controlled trial. J Dent Res.   62. Johansson B, Friberg B, Nilson H. Digitally planned,
             2013;92(12 Suppl):154S-60S.                         immediately loaded dental implants with prefabricated
           48. Apostolakis D, Brown JE. The anterior loop of the inferior   prostheses in the reconstruction of edentulous maxillae: a
             alveolar nerve: prevalence, measurement of its length and a   1-year prospective, multicenter study. Clin Implant Dent
             recommendation for interforaminal implant installation   Relat Res. 2009;11:194-200.
             based on cone beam CT imaging. Clin Oral Implants Res.   63. Malo P, de Araujo Nobre M, Lopes A, Ferro A, Gravito I.
             2012;23:1022-30.                                    All-on-4(R) Treatment Concept for the Rehabilitation of the
           49. Krennmair S, Weinlander M, Malek M, Forstner T, Krennmair   Completely Edentulous Mandible: A 7-Year Clinical and
             G, Stimmelmayr M. Mandibular Full-Arch Fixed Prostheses   5-Year Radiographic Retrospective Case Series with Risk
             Supported on 4 Implants with Either Axial Or Tilted Distal   Assessment for Implant Failure and Marginal Bone Level.
             Implants: A 3-Year Prospective Study. Clin Implant Dent Relat   Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2015;17 Suppl 2:e531-41.
             Res. 2016;18:1119-33.                            64. Meloni SM, De Riu G, Pisano M, Cattina G, Tullio A. Implant
           50. Sun HL, Huang C, Wu YR, Shi B. Failure rates of short (</= 10   treatment software planning and guided flapless surgery with
             mm) dental implants and factors influencing their failure: a   immediate provisional prosthesis delivery in the fully
             systematic review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2011;26:816-25  edentulous maxilla. A retrospective analysis of 15 consecutively
           51. Telleman G, Raghoebar GM, Vissink A, den Hartog L,   treated patients. Eur J Oral Implantol. 2010;3:245-51
             Huddleston Slater JJ, Meijer HJ. A systematic review of the   65. Patzelt SB, Bahat O, Reynolds MA, Strub JR. The all-on-four
             prognosis of short (<10 mm) dental implants placed in the   treatment concept: a systematic review. Clin Implant Dent
             partially edentulous patient. J Clin Periodontol. 2011;38:667-  Relat Res. 2014;16:836-55.
             76.                                              66. Jokstad A, Sanz M, Ogawa T, Bassi F, Levin L, Wennerberg A, et
           52. Stellingsma K, Raghoebar GM, Visser A, Vissink A, Meijer HJ.   al. A Systematic Review of the Role of Implant Design in the
             The extremely resorbed mandible, 10-year results of a   Rehabilitation of the Edentulous Maxilla. Int J Oral Maxillofac
             randomized controlled trial on 3 treatment strategies. Clin   Implants. 2016;31 Suppl:s43-99.
             Oral Implants Res. 2014;25:926-32.               67. Mericske-Stern R, Worni A. Optimal number of oral implants
           53. Elnayef B, Monje A, Gargallo-Albiol J, Galindo-Moreno P, Wang   for fixed reconstructions: a review of the literature. Eur J Oral
             HL, Hernandez-Alfaro F. Vertical Ridge Augmentation in the   Implantol. 2014;7 Suppl 2:S133-53
             Atrophic Mandible: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.   68. Chrcanovic BR, Kisch J, Albrektsson T, Wennerberg A. Bruxism
             Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2017;32:291-312.    and dental implant treatment complications: a retrospective
           54. Buser D, Janner SF, Wittneben JG, Bragger U, Ramseier CA,   comparative study of 98 bruxer patients and a matched
             Salvi GE. 10-year survival and success rates of 511 titanium   group. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2017;28:e1-e9.
             implants with a sandblasted and acid-etched surface: a   69. Chrcanovic BR, Kisch J, Albrektsson T, Wennerberg A. Analysis
             retrospective study in 303 partially edentulous patients. Clin   of risk factors for cluster behavior of dental implant failures.
             Implant Dent Relat Res. 2012;14:839-51.             Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2017;19:632-42.
           55. Gamper FB, Benic GI, Sanz-Martin I, Asgeirsson AG,   70. Bornstein MM, Cionca N, Mombelli A. Systemic conditions
             Hammerle CHF, Thoma DS. Randomized controlled clinical   and treatments as risks for implant therapy. Int J Oral
             trial comparing one-piece and two-piece dental implants   Maxillofac Implants. 2009;24 Suppl:12-27
             supporting fixed and removable dental prostheses: 4- to   71. Guazzo R, Sbricoli L, Ricci S, Bressan E, Piattelli A, Iaculli F.
             6-year observations. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2017;28:1553-9.   Medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw and dental
           56. Zhang XX, Shi JY, Gu YX, Lai HC. Long-Term Outcomes of   implants failures: a systematic review. J Oral Implantol. 2016.
             Early Loading of Straumann Implant-Supported Fixed   72. Aglietta M, Siciliano VI, Zwahlen M, Bragger U, Pjetursson BE,
             Segmented Bridgeworks in Edentulous Maxillae: A 10-Year   Lang NP, et al. A systematic review of the survival and
             Prospective Study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2016;18:1227-  complication rates of implant supported fixed dental
             37.                                                 prostheses with cantilever extensions after an observation
           57. Branemark PI, Svensson B, van Steenberghe D. Ten-year   period of at least 5 years. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2009;20:441-
             survival rates of fixed prostheses on four or six implants ad   51.
             modum Branemark in full edentulism. Clin Oral Implants   73. Torrecillas-Martinez L, Monje A, Lin GH, Suarez F, Ortega-
             Res. 1995;6:227-31.                                 Oller I, Galindo-Moreno P, et al. Effect of cantilevers for
           58. Chan HL, Benavides E, Yeh CY, Fu JH, Rudek IE, Wang HL. Risk   implant-supported prostheses on marginal bone loss and
             assessment of lingual plate perforation in posterior   prosthetic complications: systematic review and meta-
             mandibular region: a virtual implant placement study using   analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2014;29:1315-21.
             cone-beam computed tomography. J Periodontol. 2011;82:129-  74. Abdulmajeed AA, Lim KG, Narhi TO, Cooper LF. Complete-
             35.                                                 arch implant-supported monolithic zirconia fixed dental
           59. Agliardi EL, Pozzi A, Stappert CF, Benzi R, Romeo D, Gherlone   prostheses: A systematic review. J Prosthet Dent.
             E. Immediate fixed rehabilitation of the edentulous maxilla:   2016;115:672-7 e1.
             a prospective clinical and radiological study after 3 years of   75. Romeo E, Storelli S. Systematic review of the survival rate
             loading. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2014;16:292-302.  and the biological, technical, and aesthetic complications of
           60. Bergkvist G, Sahlholm S, Nilner K, Lindh C. Implant-  fixed dental prostheses with cantilevers on implants
             supported fixed prostheses in the edentulous maxilla. A   reported in longitudinal studies with a mean of 5 years
             2-year clinical and radiological follow-up of treatment with   follow-up. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2012;23 Suppl 6:39-49.
   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45