Page 38 - SPEMD_60-4
P. 38
186 rev port estomatol med dent cir maxilofac. 2019;60(4):175-188
bleeding disorders, or intake of medication for osteonecrosis Ethical disclosures
(e.g. oral bisphosphonates) have already been highlighted in
previous reviews. 70,71 Protection of human and animal subjects. The authors
Taking into consideration the possible effect of distal can- declare that the procedures followed were in accordance with
tilevers in implant-supported prostheses, the available evi- the regulations of the relevant clinical research ethics com-
dence does not support any correlation between peri-implant mittee and with those of the Code of Ethics of the World Med-
72
bone loss and cantilever extension. However, minor mechan- ical Association (Declaration of Helsinki).
ical complications were found when cantilevers were pres- Confidentiality of data. The authors declare that they have
73
ent. When this extension is greater than 14 mm and in oc-
clusion with a natural second molar, an increased mechanical followed the protocols of their work center on access to patient
data and for its publication.
74
risk can be expected. This factor was also considered a de-
ciding factor in the present classification. It should be noted Right to privacy and informed consent. The authors have
that the available evidence regarding the role of cantilevers is obtained the written informed consent of the patients or sub-
scarce, heterogeneous, lacks results of clinical trials reporting jects mentioned in the article. The corresponding author is in
appropriate outcomes and often excludes patients with para- possession of this document.
75
functional habits. Therefore, depending on the risk factors
identified during treatment planning, this classification sys-
tem proposes a decrease of tension and stress distribution Conflict of interest
across more implants or a minimally invasive approach when
required by the patient’s systemic condition. The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.
The values proposed in each CC class may not match all
types of clinical cases as they represent a general averaged
standard. A retrospective cohort analysis reporting the implant
and prosthodontic success of each rehabilitation scheme will references
be published to underline the clinical relevance of the pro- 1. Carlsson GE, Omar R. The future of complete dentures in oral
posed classification system. rehabilitation. A critical review. J Oral Rehabil. 2010;37:143-56.
Finally, assuming a pyramidal complexity structure, the 2. Schimmel M, Muller F, Suter V, Buser D. Implants for elderly
CC also helps with the clinical case level assessment. Al- patients. Periodontol 2000. 2017;73:228-40.
though most of the CC rehabilitation schemes may be clas- 3. Polzer I, Schimmel M, Muller F, Biffar R. Edentulism as part of
sified as Advanced or Complex oral surgery procedures, they the general health problems of elderly adults. Int Dent J.
2010;60:143-55.
present different levels of surgical difficulty that increase 4. de Bruyn H, Collaert B, Linden U, Bjorn AL. Patient’s opinion
16
with jaw atrophy. On a Complex level, different degrees of and treatment outcome of fixed rehabilitation on Branemark
complexity can be found, and this has been rarely described implants. A 3-year follow-up study in private dental
in the literature so far. An example of this situation is the practices. Clin Oral Implants Res. 1997;8:265-71.
comparison between the difficulty levels of the Maxilla CCI 5. Dierens M, Collaert B, Deschepper E, Browaeys H, Klinge B, De
Option B and the Maxilla CCV Option A. Both are Complex Bruyn H. Patient-centered outcome of immediately loaded
treatment options but require different learning curves and implants in the rehabilitation of fully edentulous jaws. Clin
Oral Implants Res. 2009;20:1070-7.
surgical expertise and experience. By stating these differenc- 6. De Bruyn H, Raes S, Matthys C, Cosyn J. The current use of
es, we intend to optimize communication between clinicians patient-centered/reported outcomes in implant dentistry: a
and also recognize the importance of referral in certain clin- systematic review. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2015;26 Suppl
ical cases. 11:45-56.
7. Pommer B, Mailath-Pokorny G, Haas R, Busenlechner D,
Furhauser R, Watzek G. Patients’ preferences towards
Conclusions minimally invasive treatment alternatives for implant
rehabilitation of edentulous jaws. Eur J Oral Implantol. 2014;7
Suppl 2:S91-109
This paper proposed a comprehensible and “user-friendly” 8. Arvidson K, Esselin O, Felle-Persson E, Jonsson G, Smedberg
patient-centered classification system of the different fixed JI, Soderstrom U. Early loading of mandibular full-arch
prosthodontic options for edentulous maxilla and mandible. bridges screw retained after 1 week to four to five
In contrast to previous descriptions, this classification system Monotype((R)) implants: 3-year results from a prospective
was developed focusing on the patient rather than on the im- multicentre study. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2008;19:693-703.
plant system technique. This approach for a classification 9. Barbier L, Abeloos J, De Clercq C, Jacobs R. Peri-implant bone
changes following tooth extraction, immediate placement
system is new and has not been previously described. The five and loading of implants in the edentulous maxilla. Clin Oral
levels of jaw anatomy and the illustrated fixed full-arch Investig. 2012;16:1061-70.
schemes aim to aid clinicians during treatment planning 10. Degidi M, Nardi D, Piattelli A. 10-year follow-up of
while underlining a pyramidal complexity hierarchy of the immediately loaded implants with TiUnite porous anodized
different classes, from simple to complex. Besides being help- surface. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2012;14:828-38.
ful, this classification also aims to optimize and simplify, thus 11. Tealdo T, Bevilacqua M, Menini M, Pera F, Ravera G, Drago C,
creating a system of communication between clinicians and et al. Immediate versus delayed loading of dental implants in
edentulous maxillae: a 36-month prospective study. Int J
patients. Prosthodont. 2011;24:294-302.

