Page 38 - SPEMD_60-4
P. 38

186                    rev port estomatol med dent cir maxilofac. 2019;60(4):175-188


           bleeding disorders, or intake of medication for osteonecrosis   Ethical disclosures
           (e.g. oral bisphosphonates) have already been highlighted in
           previous reviews. 70,71                            Protection of human and animal subjects. The  authors
             Taking into consideration the possible effect of distal can-  declare that the procedures followed were in accordance with
           tilevers in implant-supported prostheses, the available evi-  the regulations of the relevant clinical research ethics com-
           dence does not support any correlation between peri-implant   mittee and with those of the Code of Ethics of the World Med-
                                      72
           bone loss and cantilever extension.  However, minor mechan-  ical Association (Declaration of Helsinki).

           ical complications were found when cantilevers were pres-  Confidentiality of data. The authors declare that they have
              73
           ent.  When this extension is greater than 14 mm and in oc-
           clusion with a natural second molar, an increased mechanical   followed the protocols of their work center on access to patient
                                                              data and for its publication.
                           74
           risk can be expected.  This factor was also considered a de-
           ciding factor in the present classification. It should be noted   Right to privacy and informed consent. The authors have
           that the available evidence regarding the role of cantilevers is   obtained the written informed consent of the patients or sub-
           scarce, heterogeneous, lacks results of clinical trials reporting   jects mentioned in the article. The corresponding author is in
           appropriate outcomes and often excludes patients with para-  possession of this document.
                         75
           functional habits.  Therefore, depending on the risk factors
           identified during treatment planning, this classification sys-
           tem proposes a decrease of tension and stress distribution   Conflict of interest
           across more implants or a minimally invasive approach when
           required by the patient’s systemic condition.      The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.
             The values proposed in each CC class may not match all
           types of clinical cases as they represent a general averaged
           standard. A retrospective cohort analysis reporting the implant
           and prosthodontic success of each rehabilitation scheme will   references
           be published to underline the clinical relevance of the pro-  1. Carlsson GE, Omar R. The future of complete dentures in oral
           posed classification system.                          rehabilitation. A critical review. J Oral Rehabil. 2010;37:143-56.
             Finally, assuming a pyramidal complexity structure, the   2. Schimmel M, Muller F, Suter V, Buser D. Implants for elderly
           CC also helps with the clinical case level assessment. Al-  patients. Periodontol 2000. 2017;73:228-40.
           though most of the CC rehabilitation schemes may be clas-  3. Polzer I, Schimmel M, Muller F, Biffar R. Edentulism as part of
           sified as Advanced or Complex oral surgery procedures, they   the general health problems of elderly adults. Int Dent J.
                                                                 2010;60:143-55.
           present different levels of surgical difficulty that increase   4. de Bruyn H, Collaert B, Linden U, Bjorn AL. Patient’s opinion
                         16
           with jaw atrophy.  On a Complex level, different degrees of   and treatment outcome of fixed rehabilitation on Branemark
           complexity can be found, and this has been rarely described   implants. A 3-year follow-up study in private dental
           in the literature so far. An example of this situation is the   practices. Clin Oral Implants Res. 1997;8:265-71.
           comparison between the difficulty levels of the Maxilla CCI   5. Dierens M, Collaert B, Deschepper E, Browaeys H, Klinge B, De
           Option B and the Maxilla CCV Option A. Both are Complex   Bruyn H. Patient-centered outcome of immediately loaded
           treatment options but require different learning curves and   implants in the rehabilitation of fully edentulous jaws. Clin
                                                                 Oral Implants Res. 2009;20:1070-7.
           surgical expertise and experience. By stating these differenc-  6. De Bruyn H, Raes S, Matthys C, Cosyn J. The current use of
           es, we intend to optimize communication between clinicians   patient-centered/reported outcomes in implant dentistry: a
           and also recognize the importance of referral in certain clin-  systematic review. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2015;26 Suppl
           ical cases.                                           11:45-56.
                                                               7. Pommer B, Mailath-Pokorny G, Haas R, Busenlechner D,
                                                                 Furhauser R, Watzek G. Patients’ preferences towards
           Conclusions                                           minimally invasive treatment alternatives for implant
                                                                 rehabilitation of edentulous jaws. Eur J Oral Implantol. 2014;7
                                                                 Suppl 2:S91-109
           This paper proposed a comprehensible and  “user-friendly”   8. Arvidson K, Esselin O, Felle-Persson E, Jonsson G, Smedberg
           patient-centered classification system of the different fixed   JI, Soderstrom U. Early loading of mandibular full-arch
           prosthodontic options for edentulous maxilla and mandible.   bridges screw retained after 1 week to four to five
           In contrast to previous descriptions, this classification system   Monotype((R)) implants: 3-year results from a prospective
           was developed focusing on the patient rather than on the im-  multicentre study. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2008;19:693-703.
           plant system technique.  This approach for a classification   9. Barbier L, Abeloos J, De Clercq C, Jacobs R. Peri-implant bone
                                                                 changes following tooth extraction, immediate placement
           system is new and has not been previously described. The five   and loading of implants in the edentulous maxilla. Clin Oral
           levels of jaw anatomy and the illustrated fixed full-arch   Investig. 2012;16:1061-70.
           schemes aim to aid clinicians during treatment planning   10. Degidi M, Nardi D, Piattelli A. 10-year follow-up of
           while underlining a pyramidal complexity hierarchy of the   immediately loaded implants with TiUnite porous anodized
           different classes, from simple to complex. Besides being help-  surface. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2012;14:828-38.
           ful, this classification also aims to optimize and simplify, thus   11. Tealdo T, Bevilacqua M, Menini M, Pera F, Ravera G, Drago C,
           creating a system of communication between clinicians and   et al. Immediate versus delayed loading of dental implants in
                                                                 edentulous maxillae: a 36-month prospective study. Int J
           patients.                                             Prosthodont. 2011;24:294-302.
   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43