Page 34 - SPEMD_58-2

90 rev port estomatol med dent cir maxilofac. 2017;58(2):79-90

21. Ferreira J, França M, Correia A, Reis A. Implant-abutment 36. Eser A, Akca K, Eckert S, Cehreli MC. Nonlinear fnite element
geometry and its role in bone level preservation. in: Natal Jorge analysis versus ex vivo strain gauge measurements on
R et al, editors. Proceedings of the Biodental Engineering II; immediately loaded implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Impl.
2012 Dec 7-8; Porto, Portugal: CRC Press. 2014;79-84 2009;24:439 -46.
22. Tabrizi R, Arabion H, Aliabadi E, Hasanzadeh F. Does increasing 37. International Standard Organization. 14801. Dentistry
the number of short implants reduce marginal bone loss in Implants Dynamic fatigue test for endosseous dental
the posterior mandible? A prospective study. British Journal of implants. Switzerland, 2007.
Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. 2016;54:731 -5. 38. American Society for Testing and Materials. D638 -02a.
23. Bhat SV, Premkumar P, Shenoy KK. Stress Distribution Standard test method for tensile properties of plastics.
Around Single Short Dental Implants: A Finite Element Study. United States of America, 2003.
The Journal of Indian Prosthodontic Society. 2014;14(1):161 -7. 39. International Standard Organization. 527 -1. Plastics
24. Himmlová L, Dostálová Tj, Kácovský A, Konvicková S. Determination of tensile properties Part 1: General
Infuence of implant length and diameter on stress principles. Switzerland, 2012.
distribution: A fnite element analysis. The Journal of 40. MatWeb [Internet]. Material property data [cited 2 Nov 2016];
Prosthetic Dentistry. 2004;91:20 -5. [about 1 screen]. Available from: http//www.matweb.com/search/
25. Calvo -Guirado JL, López Torres JA, Dard M, Javed F, Pérez- Datasheet.aspx?matGUID=237df255c8324fe6a06dc004e86d86b6.
-Albacete Martínez C, Maté Sánchez de Val JE. Evaluation of 41. MatWeb [Internet]. Material property data [cited 2 Nov 2016];
extrashort 4 -mm implants in mandibular edentulous [about 1 screen]. Available from: http//www.matweb.com/search/
patients with reduced bone height in comparison with Datasheet.aspx?MatGUID=b350a789eda946cc6b86a3e4d3c577b39.
standard implants: a 12 -month results. Clinical Oral 42. NobelBiocare. Material characteristics. Product Catalog,
Implants Research. 2016;27:867 -74. Complete Assortment, 2011;350.
26. Verri FR, Junior JFS, de Faria Almeida DA, de Oliveira GBB, 43. Avinent. Información sobre estructuras fresadas en CrCo. In:
de Souza Batista VE, Honório HM, et al. Biomechanical Protech SLCD, editor. 2013.
infuence of crown -to -implant ratio on stress distribution 44. Fonseca E, Mendes C, Noronha J. Estudo comparativo da
over internal hexagon short implant: 3 -D fnite element infuência de diferentes materiais em prótese num fémur
analysis with statistical test. Journal of biomechanics. humano. Paper presented at: 8.º congresso de mecânica
2015;48:138 -45. experimental; 2010 Apr 21-23; Guimarães, Portugal. Portuguese.
27. Keaveny T, Morgan E, OC Y. Bone Mechanics. In: M. Kutz, 45. Fessler H, Fricker D. Friction in Femoral Prosthesis and
editor. Standard Handbook of Biomedical Engineering and Photoelastic Model Cone Taper Joints. Proc Inst Mech Eng H.
Design. New York: McGraw -Hill Professional; 2003. 1989;203:1 -14.
28. Malmstrom H, Gupta B, Ghanem A, Cacciato R, Ren Y, 46. Budinski KG. Tribological properties of titanium alloys. Wear.
Romanos GE. Success rate of short dental implants 1991;151:203 -17.
supporting single crowns and fxed bridges. Clinical Oral 47. Baca E, Yengin E, Gökçen -Röhlig B, Sato S. In vivo evaluation
Implants Research. 2016;27:1093 -8. of occlusalcontact area and maximum bite force in patients
29. Chrcanovic BR, Albrektsson T, Wennerberg A. Reasons for with various types of implant -supported prostheses. Acta
failures of oral implants. Journal of Oral Rehabilitation. Odontol Scand. 2013;71:1181 -7.
2014;41:443 -76. 48. OMahony A M, Williams J L, Spencer P. Anisotropic elasticity
30. Olmedo -Gaya MV, Manzano -Moreno FJ, Cañaveral -Cavero E, of cortical and cancellous bone in the posterior mandible
de Dios Luna -del Castillo J, Vallecillo -Capilla M. Risk factors increases periimplant stress and strain under oblique
associated with early implant failure: A 5 -year retrospective loading. Clin Oral Impl Res. 2001;12:648-57.
clinical study. The Journal of prosthetic dentistry. 49. ASM Aerospace Specifcation metals inc. [Internet]. [Cited
2016;115:150 -5. Nov 2015]; [about 1 screen].Available from: http://asm.
31. Sennerby L, Gottlow J. Clinical outcomes of immediate/early matweb.com/search/SpecifcMaterial.asp?bassnum=mtu040.
loading of dental implants. A literature review of recent 50. NobelBiocare. Material characteristics. Product Catalog,
controlled prospective clinical studies. Australian dental Complete Assortment, 2011;356.
journal. 2008;53(s1):S82 -S8. 51. Natali AN, Hart RT, Pavan PG, Knets I. Mechanics of bone
32. Misch C. Short dental implants: a literature review and tissue. In: AN N, editor. Dental biomechanics: Taylor &
rationale for use. Dentistry today. 2005;24:64-66,68. Francis Inc. 2003;1 -19.
33. ToroIbacache V, Fitton LC, Fagan MJ, OHiggins P. Validity and 52. Frost HM. Bones Mechanostat: A 2003 Update. ANAT REC
sensitivity of a human cranial fnite element model: PART A. 2003;275A:1081 -101.
implications for comparative studies of biting performance. 53. Baggi L, Cappelloni I, Di Girolamo M, Maceri F, Vairo G. The
Journal of anatomy. 2016;228:70 -84. infuence of implant diameter and length on stress
34. Gröning F, Liu J, Fagan M, OHiggins P. Validating a voxel- distribution of osseointegrated implants related to crestal
-based fnite element model of a human mandible using bone geometry: A three -dimensional fnite element analysis.
digital speckle pattern interferometry. Journal of J Prosthet Dent. 2008;100:422 -31.
biomechanics. 2009;42:1224 -9. 54. Nissan J, Ghelfan O, Gross O, Priel I, Gross M, Chaushu G.
35. Kim H -S, Park J -Y, Kim N -E, Shin Y -S, Park J -M, Chun Y -S. The effect of crown/implant ratio and crown height
Finite element modeling technique for predicting space on stress distribution in unsplinted implant
mechanical behaviors on mandible bone during mastication. supporting restorations. J Oral Maxillofac Surg.
J Advanc Prosthod. 2012;4:218 -26. 2011;69:1934 -9.