Page 33 - SPEMD_58-2

rev port estomatol med dent cir maxilofac . 2017;58(2):79-90 89

implants in the posterior region. J Clin Periodontol.
Conclusions 2014;41:191-213.
5. Fugazzotto P. Shorter implants in clinical practice: rationale
This research allowed the development and validation of a and treatment results. International Journal of Oral and
computer -aided design model that can be used to study an Maxillofacial Implants. 2008;23:487 -96.
oral fxed rehabilitation supported by short implants. 6. Renouard F, Nisand D. Impact of implant length and diameter
The highest stress and strain values were found on the on survival rates. Clin Oral Implan Res. 2006;17:35 -51.
cortical bone around the buccal aspect of the implants. 7. Esposito M, Felice P, Worthington HV. Interventions for replacing
missing teeth: augmentation procedures of the maxillary sinus.
Future research should focus on modifying the geometry Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2014.
of the prosthetic framework in order to promote a decrease of 8. Sung -Ah L, Chun -Teh L, Martin M F, Waeil E, Sung -Kiang C.
stress and strain on cortical bone, contributing to avoid bone Systematic Review and Meta -Analysis of Randomized
resorption and implant loss. Controlled Trials for the Management of Limited Vertical
Height in the Posterior Region: Short Implants (5 to 8 mm) vs
Longer Implants (> 8 mm) in Vertically Augmented Sites.
International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants.
Ethical disclosures 2014;29:1085-97.
9. Fugazzotto P, Beagle J, Ganeles J, Jaffn R, Vlassis J, Kumar A.
Protection of human and animal subjects. The authors de- Success and failure rates of 9 mm or shorter implants in the
clare that no experiments were performed on humans or an- replacement of missing maxillary molars when restored with
imals for this study. individual crowns: preliminary results 0 to 84 months in
function. A retrospective study. J Periodontol. 2004;75:327 -32.
Confdentiality of data. The authors declare that no patient 10. Lemos CAA, Ferro -Alves ML, Okamoto R, Mendonça MR,
data appear in this article. Pellizzer EP. Short dental implants versus standard dental
implants placed in the posterior jaws: A systematic review
Right to privacy and informed consent. The authors declare and meta -analysis. Journal of dentistry. 2016;47:8 -17.
that no patient data appear in this article. 11. Renouard F, Rangert B. Treatment Sequence and Planning
Protocol. Risk Factors in Implant Dentistry Simplifed Clinical
Analysis for Predictable Treatment. 2nd ed. Chicagi:
Funding Quintessence books; 2008;146 -50.
12. Renouard F, Nisand D. Impact of implant length and diameter
The study was supported in part by SciTech - Science and on survival rates. Clinical Oral Implants Research.
Technology for Competitive and Sustainable Industries, and 2006;17(S2):35 -51.
the R&D project was cofnanced by the North Portugal Region- 13. Mendoza -Azpur G, Lau M, Valdivia E, Rojas J, Muñoz H,
Nevins M. Assessment of Marginal Peri -implant Bone -Level
al Operational Program (NORTE2020) and the European Re- Short -Length Implants Compared with Standard Implants
gional Development Fund (FEDER). Supporting Single Crowns in a Controlled Clinical Trial:
12 -Month Follow -up. The International journal of
periodontics & restorative dentistry. 2016;36:791.
Conflicts of interest 14. Camps -Font O, Burgueño -Barris G, Figueiredo R, Jung RE,
Gay -Escoda C, Valmaseda -Castellón E. Interventions for
Dental Implant Placement in Atrophic Edentulous Mandibles:
The authors have no conficts of interest to declare.
Vertical Bone Augmentation and Alternative Treatments. A
Meta -Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials. Journal of
Periodontology. 2016;1 -23.
Acknowledgements 15. Kim S, Kim S, Choi H, Woo D, Park Y -B, Shim J -S, et al. A
three -dimensional fnite element analysis of short dental
The authors gratefully acknowledge the INEGI, particularly to Mr. implants in the posterior maxilla. International Journal of
José Teixeira, Mrs. Andreia Durães and Mr. Sertório Lares, for their Oral & Maxillofacial Implants. 2014;29:155 -64.
help on the specimens and experimental set up preparation. 16. Anitua E, Tapia R, Luzuriaga F, Orive G. Infuence of implant
length, diameter, and geometry on stress distribution: a fnite
element analysis. International Journal of Periodontics &
references Restorative Dentistry. 2010;30:89 -96.
17. Renouard F, Nisand D. Short Implants in the Severely
1. Pommer B, Busenlechner D, Fürhauser R, Watzek G, Mailath- Resorbed Maxilla: A 2 -Year Retrospective Clinical Study. Clin
-Pokorny G, Haas R. Trends in techniques to avoid bone Implant Dent Relat Res. 2005;7:s104 -s10.
augmentation surgery: Application of short implants, 18. Deporter D, Watson P, Pharoah M, Todescan R, Tomlinson G.
narrow -diameter implants and guided surgery. Journal of Ten -Year Results of a Prospective Study Using Porous-
Cranio -Maxillofacial Surgery. 2016. -Surfaced Dental Implants and a Mandibular Overdenture.
2. Pellizzer EP, de Mello CC, Santiago Junior JF, de Souza Batista Clinical Iinplant Dentistry and Related Research. 2002;4:183 -9.
VE, de Faria Almeida DA, Verri FR. Analysis of the 19. Yamanishi Y, Yamaguchi S, Imazato S, Nakano T, Yatani H.
biomechanical behavior of short implants: The photo- Infuences of implant neck design and implantabutment
-elasticity method. Materials Science and Engineering: C. joint type on peri -implant bone stress and abutment
2015;55:187 -92. micromovement: Three -dimensional fnite element analysis.
3. Nisand D, Renouard F. Short implant in limited bone volume. Dent mater. 2012;28:1126 -33.
Periodontology 2000. 2014;66:72 -96. 20. Feitosa P, de Lima A, Silva -Concílio L, Brandt W, Claro Neves
4. Mezzomo LA, Miller R, Triches D, Alonso F, RSA. S. Meta- A. Stability of external and internal implant connections
-analysis of single crowns supported by short (<10 mm) after a fatigue test. Eur J Dent. 2013;7:267 -71.