Page 18 - SPEMD_61-2

56 rev port estomatol med dent cir maxilofac. 2020;61(2):52-56

Although cross -sectional studies with retrospective anal- ‘keratocystic odontogenic tumour’ for the solid variant of
ysis represent important study methods for collecting clinical odontogenic keratocyst? J Cranio Maxill Surg. 2018;46:942 -6.
data, they present some limitations. The main limitation of 4. Jaeger F, Noronha MS, Silva MLV, Figueiredo MBA, Carmago
this study is the inadequate completion of some clinical re- SM, Campolina GM, et al. Prevalence profile of odontogenic
cysts and tumors on Brazilian sample after the
cords that accompanied the specimens sent for histopatho- reclassification of odontogenic keratocyst. J Cranio Maxill
logical examination, consequently omitting relevant informa- Surg. 2017;45:267 -70.
tion and impairing the observation of clinical data related to 5. Barnes L, Eveson JW, Reichart P, SIdransky D. World Health
the studied lesions. Organization Classification of Tumours. Pathology and
genetics of head and neck tumours. 3th ed IARC Press: Lyon.
2005. p.283 -327.
Conclusions 6. El -Naggar AK, Chan JKC, Grandis JR, Takata T, Slootweg PJ.
World Health Organization classification of tumours.
Pathology and genetics of head and neck tumours. 3th ed
In conclusion, the clinical and radiographic profile of recurrent IARC Press. 2017. p. 80 -83.
and non -recurrent OKCs observed in this study agree with 7. Azevedo RS, Cabral MG, dos Santos TC, de Oliveira AV, de
findings commonly reported in the literature, except for the Almeida OP, Pires FR. Histopathological features of
lack of gender predilection. Regarding clinical characteristics, keratocystic odontogenic tumor: a descriptive study of 177
no gender predilection for isolated or recurrent OKCs was ob- cases from a Brazilian population. Int J Surg Pathol.
2012;20:154 -60.
served. The lesions occurred mainly in adults, and the most 8. Florindo JB, Bruno OM, Landini G. Morphological
common anatomical site was the posterior mandible, present- classification of odontogenic keratocysts using Bouligand-
ing mainly as a unilocular radiolucency lesion in both groups. -Minkowski fractal descriptors. Comput Biol Med. 2017;81:1-
In addition, OKC displayed a 13.2% recurrence rate when con- -10.
servatively treated by decompression and surgical enucleation. 9. Chrcanovic BR, Gomez RS. Recurrence probability for
keratocystic odontogenic tumors: An analysis of 6427 cases. J
Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2017;45:244 -51.
10. Fidele NB, Zhao Y, Tianfu W, Sun Y, Man Q, Liu B. Treatment of
Acknowledgements
Multiple Odontogenic Keratocysts Involving Chinese Patients.
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2019;77:2044 -54.
We would like to thank the Coordination for the Improve- 11. Oh JS, You JS, Kim SG. Clinical and histomorphometric
ment of Higher Education Personnel for the scholarship evaluation of decompression followed by enucleation in the
(CAPES). treatment of odontogenic keratocyst. J Dent Sci. 2018;13:329-
-33.
12. Ribeiro -Júnior O, Borba AM, Alves CAF, Gouveia MM, Deboni
MCZ, Naclério -Homem MG. Reclassification and treatment of
Ethical disclosures odontogenic keratocysts: A cohort study. Braz Oral Res.
2017;31:e98.
Protection of human and animal subjects. The authors 13. Baik WK, Baik HS, Choi SH. Comprehensive orthodontic
declare that no experiments were performed on humans or treatment of a young girl with an odontogenic keratocyst
animals for this study. and impacted teeth in the mandible. Korean J Orthod.
2020;50:63 -71.
Confidentiality of data. The authors declare that no patient 14. Sigua -Rodriguez EA, Goulart DR, Sverzut A, Aspirino L,
Moraes M. Is Surgical Treatment Based on a 1 -Step or 2 -Step
data appear in this article. Protocol Effective in Managing the Odontogenic Keratocyst? J
Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2019;77:1210.e1 -1210.e7.
Right to privacy and informed consent. The authors declare 15. Cunha JF, Gomes CC, de Mesquita RA, Andrade Goulart EM,
that no patient data appear in this article. de Castro WH, Gomez RS. Clinicopathologic features
associated with recurrence of the odontogenic keratocyst: a
cohort retrospective analysis. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol
Oral Radiol. 2016;121:629 -35.
Conflict of interest
16. Karaca C, Dere KA, Er N, Aktas A, Tosun E, Koseoglu OT,
Usubutun A. Recurrence rate of odontogenic keratocyst
The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare. treated by enucleation and peripheral ostectomy:
Retrospective case series with up to 12 years of follow -up.
Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2018;23:443 -8.
references 17. Kinard B, Hansen G, Newman M. How well do we manage the
odontogenic keratocyst? A multicenter study. Oral Surg Oral
1. Chandrashekar C, Patel P, Thennavan A, Radhakrishnan R. Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 2019;127:282 -8.
Odontogenic keratocyst: Analysis of recurrence by AgNOR, 18. Gomes CC, Guimarães LM, Diniz MG, Gomez RS. Molecular
p53 and MDM2 profiling. J Oral Maxillofac Pathol. 2020; alterations in odontogenic keratocysts as potential
24:184 -5. therapeutic targets. J Oral Pathol Med. 2017;46:877 -82.
2. Soluk -Tekkeşin M, Wright JM. The World Health Organization 19. Souza LB, Gordón -Núñez MA, Nonaka CF, de Medeiros MC,
Classification of Odontogenic Lesions: A Summary of the Torres TF, Emiliano GB. Odontogenic cysts: demographic
Changes of the 2017 (4th) Edition. Turk Patoloji Derg. profile in a Brazilian population over a 38 -year period. Med
2018;34:1–18. Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2010;15:583 -90.
3. Devrim K, Omer G, Bulent C. A series of 240 odontogenic 20. Bilodeau EA, Collins BM. Odontogenic Cysts and Neoplasms.
keratocysts: Should we continue to use the terminology of Surg Pathol Clin. 2017;10:177 -222.