Page 14 - SPEMD_58-2

70 rev port estomatol med dent cir maxilofac. 2017;58(2):65-70

brackets bonded to four different provisional restorations.
Conclusions Angle Orthod. 2014;84:649-55.
3. Gratton DG, Aquilino SA. Interim restorations. Dent Clin
Considering the limitations involved in the present literature North Am. 2004;48:487-97.
review, related to different methods used to assess the bond 4. Rambhia S, Heshmati R, Dhuru V, Iacopino A. Shear bond
strength of brackets to provisional surfaces and the type of strength of orthodontic brackets bonded to provisional
studies considered (in vitro), only indications can be drawn. crown materials utilizing two different adhesives. Angle
Orthod. 2009;79:784-9.
Low values of bond strength were observed for acrylic sub- 5. Chay SH, Wong SL, Mohamed N, Chia A, Yap AU. Effects of
strates. Some studies reported shear bond strength values surface treatment and aging on the bond strength of
below the clinically acceptable level. The type of surface orthodontic brackets to provisional materials. Am J Orthod
seems to infuence the adhesion of brackets. Surface treat- Dentofacial Orthop. 2007;132:577.e7-11.
ments should be performed to improve the bond strength, 6. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG. The PRISMA Group.
and sandblasting or laser irradiation should be considered. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and
The type of adhesive should be evaluated before bonding, to meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. J Clin Epidemiol.
2009;14:1006-12.
consider the ones that improve the chemical adhesion for 7. Goymen M, Topcuoglu T, Topcuoglu S, Akin H. Effect of
brackets to bond to provisional acrylic surfaces. different temporary crown materials and surface roughening
The indications of the present study should be carefully methods on the shear bond strengths of orthodontic
analysed and their extrapolation to the clinical practice should brackets. Photomed Laser Surg. 2015;33:55-60.
take into account that they were drawn based on a review of 8. Maryanchik I, Brendlinger EJ, Fallis DW, Vandewalle KS. Shear
in vitro studies. bond strength of orthodontic brackets bonded to various
esthetic pontic materials. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop.
2010;137:684-9.
9. de Almeida JX, Deprá MB, Marquezan M, Retamoso LB,
Ethical disclosures Tanaka O. Effects of surface treatment of provisional crowns
on the shear bond strength of brackets. Dental Press J
Protection of human and animal subjects. The authors Orthod. 2013;18:29-34.
declare that no experiments were performed on humans or 10. Dias FM, Pinzan-Vercelino CR, Tavares RR, Gurgel Jde A,
animals for this study. Bramante FS, Fialho MN. Evaluation of an alternative
technique to optimize direct bonding of orthodontic brackets
Confdentiality of data. The authors declare that no patient to temporary crowns. Dental Press J Orthod. 2015;20:57-62.
data appear in this article. 11. Soon HI, Gill DS, Jones SP. A study to investigate the bond
strengths of orthodontic brackets bonded to prosthetic
Right to privacy and informed consent. The authors declare acrylic teeth. J Orthod. 2015;42:192-9.
that no patient data appear in this article. 12. Masioli DLC, Almeida MAO, Masioli MA, Almeida JRM.
Assessment of the effect of different surface treatments on
the bond strength of brackets bonded to acrylic resin. Dental
Press J Orthod. 2011;16:37-47.
Conflict of interest 13. Correia AMO, Jóia RP, Rode SM, Repek CE, Mendonça AAM,
Paranhos LR. Bonding orthodontic braces in acrylic resin
The authors have no conficts of interest to declare. with cyanoacrylate: does it improve adesion? Matéria (Rio J.)
2016;21:235-42.
14. Artun J, Bergland S. Clinical trials with crystal growth
Acknowledgments conditioning as an alternative to acid-etch enamel
pretreatment. Am J Orthod. 1984;85:333-40.
15. Grewal Bach GK, Torrealba Y, Lagravère MO. Orthodontic
The author M.C. Manso acknowledges Fundação para a Ciência bonding to porcelain: a systematic review. Angle Orthod.
e a Tecnologia through grant UID/Multi/04546/2013 and UID/ 2014;84:555-60.
QUI/50006/2013 POCI/01/0145/FERDER/007265. 16. Reynolds IR. A review of direct orthodontic bonding. Br J
Orthod. 1975;2:171-8.
17. Eliades T, Bourauel C. Intraoral aging of orthodontic
Appendices materials: the picture we miss and its clinical relevance. Am J
Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2005;127:403-12.
18. Bishara SE, Soliman M, Laffoon J, Warren JJ. Effect of changing
Supplementary content Supplementary data associated with a test parameter on the shear bond strength of orthodontic
this article can be found, in the online version, at http://doi. brackets. Angle Orthod. 2005;75:832-5.
org/10.24873/j.rpemd.2017.07.020. 19. Abdelnaby YL. Effects of cyclic loading on the bond strength
of metal orthodontic brackets bonded to a porcelain surface
using different conditioning protocols. Angle Orthod.
references 2011;81:1064-9.
20. Sood A, Ramarao S, Carounanidy U. Infuence of different
1. Finnema KJ, Ozcan M, Post WJ, Ren Y, Dijkstra PU. In-vitro crosshead speeds on diametral tensile strength of a
orthodontic bond strength testing: a systematic review and methacrylate based resin composite: An in-vitro study. J
meta-analysis. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2010;137:615-22. Conserv Dent. 2015;18:214-7.
2. Al Jabbari YS, Al Taweel SM, Al Rifaiy M, Alqahtani MQ, 21. Klocke A, Kahl-Nieke B. Infuence of cross-head speed in
Koutsoukis T, Zinelis S. Effects of surface treatment and orthodontic bond strength testing. Dent Mater.
artifcial aging on the shear bond strength of orthodontic 2005;21:139-44.